Court Reporting Setups by Job Type: What Each Method Needs, and What the Rules Allow
Setups for stenographic, voice-writing, and digital reporters, job by job: capture, audio, realtime, power, security, and the rules that limit each method.
Key takeaways
- Know what your record is before you pick the gear: the notes for steno and voice writers, the monitored recording for digital reporters, and backup audio as backup, not the record, in most settings.
- The rules choose the method first. Check whether your jurisdiction allows a digital deposition or licenses voice writers before you book.
- Remote and hybrid jobs are audio-routing jobs: one audio device per room, even when everyone logs in, and the platform's audio captured into files you control.
- Redundancy is a habit, not a product: two copies of everything you write, two ways to stay powered, and a second way online.
- Software can help make the record. The certified transcript is still the reporter's or the transcriber's.
Every job starts with two questions: what will the record be, and who will sign it? California’s Court Reporters Board answers the first for two of the three methods: “The stenographic/voice notes are the official record.”1 For digital reporting, the recording is the official record where the rules make it so, as in Florida’s Eighteenth Circuit, and in federal court a court-approved transcriber certifies the transcript made from it.23 The gear follows from those answers, and so do the rules.
This guide is for stenographic reporters, voice writers, digital reporters and transcribers, and the agencies that book them. It is organized by job, and within each job it says what changes for each method. It closes with the rules and credentials that decide which method may take a job at all.
Each method has its own professional body and credentials: NCRA’s RPR for “Current or aspiring stenographic reporters,”4 NVRA’s voice-writing exams,5 and AAERT’s exams for digital capture, depositions, and transcription.6 Where the bodies disagree, we attribute each position to the body that holds it. Products appear only as examples of what their makers’ own documentation says, not as recommendations or rankings, and we quote no prices.
One thing does not change with the method. Federal law puts the certificate on “The reporter or other individual designated to produce the record,”7 and NCRA’s 2026 position statement holds that AI and speech recognition “cannot replace a trained, certified, impartial human court reporter and/or captioner in the creation, preservation, and certification of the official record.”8 Our reading: software and recordings support the record. The reporter or the transcriber makes it and signs it.
To turn this guide into a job sheet, use the companion setup picker: pick your method and job, and print a checklist where every line links back to the section that sources it.
At a glance
This matrix is DepoStack’s synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard. Find the job, read across to your method, and follow the link. Where a rule may bar or limit a method, the cell points to the rules table, current as of October 13, 2026.
| Job | Stenographic | Voice writing | Digital |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-person deposition | Writer on USB, Bluetooth paired as a spare; writer audio on; realtime by local router or internet (setup).91011 | USB mask or adapter, engine, voice CAT; room audio on a second sound device; second mask output to a recorder (setup).1213 | Check your jurisdiction first (rules); then a mic per speaking party, monitoring, log notes, and a battery backup recorder (setup).141516 |
| Remote deposition | Platform audio into CAT by virtual audio device or loopback; realtime over the internet (setup).1718 | The same capture, on headphones; the mask is never the platform mic (our synthesis) (setup).19 | Per-participant tracks when you may record; backup on a separate signal and connection (setup).2021 |
| Hybrid deposition | One device carries the room’s audio; a two-computer pattern (setup).2223 | The steno audio plan; no voice-specific source (our synthesis) (setup). | A mic on each person in the room, plus the platform’s audio (setup).24 |
| Videotaped deposition | Sync timestamps with the videographer; ask for the mixer audio (setup).2526 | The same; in Florida, whether voice is “stenographic” is unresolved (rules).27 | Opening repeated on each recording unit; Florida also requires a steno record unless all parties agree (setup).2827 |
| Court hearing or trial | The court’s written realtime spec; a USB link that survives a bench conference (setup).299 | Federal policy recognizes stenomask and its realtime; state licensing varies (rules).330 | Usually the court’s system: four or more channels, confidence monitoring, momentary mutes (setup).331 |
| Arbitration, EUO, IME, meeting | The deposition setup (our synthesis), plus medical-records terms (setup).32 | As for steno (our synthesis) (setup). | AAERT’s CER covers EUOs, meetings, and arbitrations (setup).6 |
| Interpreted proceeding | Swear the interpreter first; offer a realtime screen (setup).33 | The same record rules (setup).33 | Interpreter on a separate channel from the witness (setup).34 |
| CART | Never the official reporter at the same time; display kit; backup power (setup).335 | NVRA’s RCP-M is its CART exam (setup).36 | No source we read treats a recording as CART (setup).37 |
| Realtime and rough drafts | NCRA’s CRR; drafts labelled unedited and uncertified (setup).3839 | NVRA’s RVR, on a closed mic (setup).40 | A recording produces no live text beyond log notes (setup).3 |
| Field and restricted sites | Charged writer; FailSafe keeps USB realtime; spare SD card (setup).41 | A two-output mask to a battery recorder (setup).13 | Runtime falls with more tracks and phantom power (setup).4243 |
“Check your jurisdiction” means the method question comes before the gear question. California takes depositions stenographically “Unless the parties agree or the court orders otherwise”;14 Georgia, unless the court orders otherwise;44 and Massachusetts, unless the parties stipulate.45
What the record is
Steno and voice: the notes are the record
California’s Court Reporters Board says the Board “looks to the transcript and the stenographic/voice notes, not an audio file,” and “do NOT rely upon backup audio media for transcript production.”1 Its definition of backup audio includes “the audio synchronization tool built into computer-aided translation (CAT) software”; “playback of the backup audio media in lieu of readback is not allowed”; and discretionary backup audio “is the personal property of the CSR.”46 NCRA’s guidelines agree: read back from the notes; the backup audio is the reporter’s personal property; and “A reporting firm/agency may not require that a reporter produce the backup audio media (unless ordered to do so by a court).”47 The Board’s pointers are guidance, not regulations.1
A voice writer’s notes are the voice writer’s own. California defines voice writing as a record made with “a closed microphone voice dictation silencer, steno mask, or similar device using oral shorthand and voice notes made by a certified shorthand reporter.”48 The Board explains that voice notes “are not a live or full recording of the actual proceeding.”49 Federal policy describes stenomask reporting with a “special face-mask microphone” and says “Certified realtime stenomask reporters may provide realtime services.”3
One vendor reads readback differently. ProCAT’s Winner Voice Edition page says the reporter “may play back the room recording track or voice track in response to requests to read b[ack],”50 which sits against California’s and NCRA’s bar on playback in lieu of readback.4647 For backup audio as a checking aid during editing, see The Art of the Transcript.
Where audio becomes the record
In federal court, a reporter’s convenience backup recordings “are the personal property of the court reporter,” but a backup filed with the clerk as the record of an arraignment, plea, or sentencing is a public record that “must be accompanied by a certification.”3 Court-provided sound recording “may not be used to back up court reporters, who are required by law to furnish their own equipment,” nor to give the court a backup when a reporter is recording, “as there can only be one official original record of the proceedings.”3
Minnesota goes the other way. Its Judicial Council policy, in the version effective July 1, 2024, requires an audio backup of every district-court proceeding taken stenographically, “on a court owned and approved audio recording system,” which can include court-licensed video-conferencing software; audio recorded on the steno writer does not satisfy it.51 A newer revision likely exists; we read the 2024 text.51
Our reading: find out which rule applies before you decide where your audio goes and who may have it.
Digital: the recording is the record
Where digital recording is the record, it is monitored and logged as it is made. A federal electronic court recorder must “Maintain a log of the proceeding to be retained as an aid to the transcription of the record,” and “court-approved transcriber(s),” not the system, certify “a correct transcript from the official electronic sound recording.”3 The clerk keeps the original notes or records “for not less than ten years.”7
Georgia’s 2026 superior-court rule sends the recording “to a certified court reporter who is authorized by the Board of Court Reporting to create transcripts,” and when that reporter was not present, the certificate says the transcript was “generated from a digital recording made outside my presence.” The rule “does not apply to depositions.”52 AAERT’s deposition-reporter exam defines the job as a quality audio recording, administering oaths, “time-synced notes,” live playback, and “marking and managing exhibits.”53
AI and speech recognition
NCRA’s 2026 guidance, addressed to stenographic reporters and captioners, says “AI may be used only to support the stenographic reporter’s work and not to generate the record.”54 AAERT frames its view around oversight rather than method: “The true gold standard in court reporting has never been the tool. It has always been professional oversight.”55 Texas’s 2026 court-recording study reports “near-universal agreement” among respondents “that AI alone is insufficient to produce a legally sufficient record.”56 Whether a Texas trial court abused its discretion in striking a non-stenographically recorded, AI-generated deposition transcript is pending before the Supreme Court of Texas, argued October 6, 2026 and undecided as of October 13, 2026 (see In flux).57 The longer treatment is in The Art of the Transcript.
Core kit
Equipment here is described by category and specification. A named product is an example of what its maker’s documentation says, not a recommendation; check the current documentation for your own model.
Core kit: steno
Writer and connection. Stenograph documents its NexGen writer as “Realtime ready through USB, virtual serial port, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi.”9 The links differ when a cable comes out. The NexGen guide says that if you unplug USB for a bench conference and reconnect, “the USB realtime connection will feed the strokes written during the bench conference,” and tells users of other CAT programs to check with their CAT vendor;9 a virtual serial port connection over USB does not survive unplugging.41 Stenograph also says its writers cannot establish Wi-Fi communications with CATalyst on a “wireless client isolation” network, which stops devices on the same network from talking to each other.9 An NCRA Technology Committee member, relaying a vendor trainer’s tip for one writer, advises pairing Bluetooth even if you use USB, “so you have options.”10
Storage. Stenograph’s Luminex II will not operate without its Backup SD card, which “is not intended for archiving steno notes” and overwrites its oldest files when full; Stenograph “recommends carrying an extra SD card,” and a laptop’s built-in slot “cannot read the Backup SD card.”41 Its older Wave guide describes only internal Memory of about 12,000 strokes, “approximately 50 pages.”58 Stenovations’ Zenith “creates backup files on a removable SD card in the writer itself.”59 ProCAT advertises “four physical drives” for its Xpression.60
Power and audio. Battery figures are in the battery table. In Stenograph’s FailSafe mode, the Luminex II turns off its screen, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi but keeps writing notes and audio to both SD cards, and keeps realtime going over USB.41 Some writers draw power from the laptop: on the Zenith, “The USB cable provides power to the writer.”59 For writer audio, Stenograph says “Record Audio During Job” “must be set to On,” and suggests starting gain “between 75% to 85%” on NexGen and Luminex writers.61
CAT laptop. Advantage recommends a business-class system for Eclipse (“Intel i5 or better, 3.0 GHz or faster,” “16 GB minimum” of RAM, an SSD) with multiple USB ports, notes “Older writers may require a serial adapter,” and tells MacBook users “M1/M2 Macs are not compatible.”62 An NCRA Technology Committee column says “Chromebooks are not compatible with any CAT software.”63 CAT basics are in What Is CAT Software?.
Core kit: voice
A voice writer’s kit is a chain: mask, audio interface, recognition engine, voice CAT, and computer. The links have to agree.
Mask. Talk Technologies, which sells through talktech.com, documents a two-plug Stenomask whose plugs “can be used in conjunction with two separate devices simultaneously i.e; a digital recorder and laptop.”13 Martel documents a mask with “two independent microphone outputs, one DIGITAL and one 3.5mm.”64 Talk Technologies’ quick-start guide says “If air escapes, sound escapes!” and sets the level at “Quieter than a normal speaking voice but above a whisper.”65 Its manual describes “lagging”: waiting several words before repeating, to cut false starts.66
Audio interface. Talk Technologies’ FAQ says a Stenomask with the Andrea USB Adapter “works extremely well” with engines such as Dragon, that a standard sound card “will not provide as good recognition as with a USB adapter,” and that “Cable issues are extremely common”; it gives no Windows 11 compatibility statement.67 Nuance says Dragon 16 needs “An audio input device capable of 16-bit recording”68 and that a USB microphone should plug in directly, “not a USB extension or hub.”69 To keep the room on its own track you need two sound devices: Stenograph says a USB mask “has a built-in sound card,” and the wrong room device leaves you with “two recordings of your voice.”12
Engine and voice CAT. Nuance presents Dragon Professional v16 as “optimized for Windows 11.”70 It stopped selling the English and German v15 editions after February 27, 2023, and ended v14 support on September 1, 2023.71 Stenograph’s CATalyst VP requires VP version 21 or later with Dragon Professional 16 on the same Windows 11 computer, “16 GB of RAM or more,” and no ARM (Snapdragon) processor; it says to turn off Dragon’s automatic microphone level and to dictate in Dictation mode, because otherwise “Dragon may interpret a word, like ‘copy’, as a Windows command.”12 Advantage’s EclipseVox supports Dragon and Speechmatics, “with the option to process speech in the cloud or locally,” where local processing requires Advantage hardware.72 For voice writing, Advantage recommends a Ryzen 7 or i7 at 3.5 GHz or faster and “16 GB minimum, 32 GB recommended,” and calls Dragon 16 “essential for realtime performance”;62 its EclipseVox page, though, lists Dragon “version 15 or later” as required.72 ProCAT’s Winner Voice Edition records “the court reporter’s voice on a separate track” and lets the user switch between voice and steno during a realtime session.50
Quiet. NVRA’s exam rules say “Participants may not be audible within two feet” and that built-in computer or recorder microphones must be disabled: “Turning the microphone to the lowest volume will not suffice.” During the test, a backup may record only the tester’s voice, through a handheld recorder attached to the mask.73 Those are test rules, not job rules. Our reading: the two-foot line is still a useful quiet check.
What the engine vendors do not say yet. We found no end-of-sale or end-of-support date for desktop Dragon v16 on Nuance’s v16 pages.7170 Advantage’s Boost terms say “Boost requires an active internet connection during use,” but its published terms do not address speech audio sent for cloud processing.74 If either matters to a client, ask the vendor in writing (our suggestion).
Core kit: digital
A digital reporter’s kit is a recording system: microphones, an interface or recorder that keeps each on its own channel, software with log notes, headphones, and an independent backup. Microphones, channels, levels, formats, and monitoring are covered under Audio capture.
Channels. For depositions, AAERT’s blog says “you’ll need enough channels to capture each speaking party on their own microphone, plus a table mic or two for backup.”15 BlueLedge, a training provider, recommends “a one-to-one ratio of microphones to participants,” using “phantom-powered (48V) lavalieres or hand-held microphones.”16 Two vendor examples of channel counts: SoniClear documents “up to 12 independent microphone channels,”75 and For The Record documents “up to 16 channels” for its FTR Reporter application.76
Log notes. Federal policy requires the software to “time stamp the log notes when a court recorder begins the log note rather than at the completion of the note.”3 NCSC suggests log entries for case data, each witness, objections and rulings, speaker changes, exhibits, and going on and off the record, plus an appearance sheet with “the channel designation and seating arrangement for all parties.”34 Federal policy also requires export “in a non-proprietary format” that transcribers can use “without requiring the transcribers to purchase proprietary hardware or software.”3
Backup. AAERT’s blog says “You’ll want at least one backup recording in addition to your main recording,” and suggests three.15 BlueLedge says “every reporter, no matter the methodology of capture, needs a backup recorder,” outside the main audio chain and battery powered, and recommends “at least two forms of backup recording.”16 Federal fallbacks for a failed system run from “a spare computer with the digital recording system pre-loaded” to “a backup analog recorder and hand-written log notes.”3
What the exam expects. AAERT’s CDR blueprint covers audio interfaces, power sources, confidence monitoring, channel assignment, and “live and dead rooms.”53 AAERT’s Best Practices Guide is still the 2019 edition; a 2026 edition was announced but had not appeared by October 13, 2026.77 We did not review the paid guide.
Core kit checklist. DepoStack’s synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard.
- Steno: the writer, charged, and its USB cable even if you use Bluetooth.10
- Steno: a spare SD card, if your writer uses one.41
- Steno: writer audio on, gain at the maker’s starting level.61
- Steno and voice: a laptop at or above your CAT vendor’s current spec.6212
- Voice: a mask with two outputs, and its USB adapter or a USB mask.1367
- Voice: the engine version your voice CAT requires, and a second sound device for the room.12
- Digital: a mic per speaking party, plus a table mic or two.15
- Digital: recording software that time-stamps log notes when you start them.3
- Digital: headphones that are not noise-cancelling.16
- Every method: an independent, battery-powered backup recorder.16
In-person depositions
Before the gear, the notice. Under the federal rules, the noticing party “must state in the notice the method for recording the testimony,” and “Unless the court orders otherwise, testimony may be recorded by audio, audiovisual, or stenographic means”; any party may add a method on prior notice.28 States differ: see Rules by jurisdiction.
In person: steno
The in-person steno setup is the writer, the CAT laptop, the writer’s audio, and, on realtime jobs, a path to counsel’s screens. Stenograph says “you can use a Wi-Fi router to output CaseViewNet to recipients in the same room.”11 Advantage’s Bridge Mobile serves “Unlimited viewers (local + remote)” with SSL encryption,78 and its Connection Magic Local mode works “when there is no internet available,” through a portable router.79 Stenograph’s CaseViewNet Cloud sends realtime over “any internet connection,” to people in the room or remote, and “Works with any CAT Software.”18 A practitioner’s checklist in NCRA’s journal lists a “Writer cable (when Bluetooth fails),” “2 microphones,” a “Power strip w/long cord,” and, for realtime jobs, a “Router” and a “Realtime/rough draft disclaimer.”80
In person: voice
A voice writer in person runs two inputs and a backup. Stenograph’s VP guide says voice audio and room audio need two sound devices.12 A two-output mask can feed the laptop and a separate recorder at the same time.1364 Our reading: that recorder is your backup if the laptop fails. Check the seal and your level before the witness is sworn.65 Our synthesis: borrow NVRA’s two-foot exam limit as the job’s quiet check, and ask someone at the table whether they can hear you dictate.73
In person: digital
The digital setup is a microphone per speaking party, each on its own channel, monitored from the recording, with log notes as you go.153 On a federal deposition recorded non-stenographically, “the officer must repeat the items in Rule 30(b)(5)(A)(i)-(iii) at the beginning of each unit of the recording medium,” and appearance or demeanor “must not be distorted through recording techniques.”28 Our synthesis: treat each new file or card as a new unit. AAERT’s CDR exam counts administering oaths and managing exhibits as part of the job.53 If your jurisdiction does not let a digital reporter take the deposition, check the rules first.
A placement recipe for a small conference table, DepoStack’s synthesis of the makers’ manuals cited, not an industry standard:
| Mic type | Placement, per its maker |
|---|---|
| Boundary | On the table, one “in the middle of every 4 to 6 people,” ideally no one “more than 3 feet (0.9144 m) from the nearest microphone”81 |
| Gooseneck | One per seat, the tip “within 15 to 30 cm (6 to 12 inches)” of the talker; an automatic mixer if four or more are open at once82 |
| Lavalier | On the chest, “about a hand-span distance (20-30cm) from the mouth”; most are omnidirectional83 |
In person: on the record
NCRA Advisory Opinion 6 says “Unless all counsel in an examination agree to go off the record, the reporter is duty-bound to continue reporting,” must go on the record “immediately” if counsel disagree, and should tell the parties so before starting; it applies to members to the extent consistent with local law.84 AAERT’s deposition exam tests “how and when to go on and off the record.”53 The notice matters here too: Illinois requires an audio-visual notice to “contain the name of the recording-device operator,”85 and Texas puts the party who wants a non-stenographic recording in charge of finding an oath-giver and making the recording “intelligible, accurate, and trustworthy.”86
Services stay even. NCRA’s guidelines say “Court reporters should offer comparable services to all parties in a litigation proceeding,”47 and California’s Board says a backup-audio copy offered to one party must be offered “at the same time” to the others.46
In-person pack list. DepoStack’s synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard.
- The notice, and the recording method it names.28
- Steno: the writer, charged, and its cable “when Bluetooth fails.”80
- Voice: the mask with both outputs connected, and a second sound device.1213
- Digital: a mic per speaking party, plus a table mic or two.15
- A power strip with a long cord; for realtime, a router and a draft disclaimer.80
- A battery backup recorder outside the main audio chain.16
- The off-the-record statement, said before you start.84
- A privacy filter for the screen.87
Remote depositions
Remote: authority and oath
Under the federal rules, the parties may stipulate, or the court may order, “that a deposition be taken by telephone or other remote means,” and “the deposition takes place where the deponent answers the questions.”28 California’s Board advises finding out “where the deponent is located because the laws of that jurisdiction take precedence.”88
The table is DepoStack’s synthesis of the rules cited, not an industry standard, current as of October 13, 2026.
| Jurisdiction | Remote deposition | Remote oath |
|---|---|---|
| Federal | By stipulation or court order28 | Not set by Rule 30. One MDL order allowed remote oaths where the witness’s state permits;89 a sample protocol has parties agree not to challenge the oath “even if the court reporter is not a notary public in the state where the deponent resides”90 |
| California | The officer may attend remotely at the deponent’s or deposing party’s election91 | The deponent need not be with the officer to be sworn;91 CSRs may swear remotely under CCP 2093(b)88 |
| Texas | Not addressed in the sources beyond the oath statute | A CSR may swear a witness “without being at the same location”; the statute lists four ways to prove identity92 |
| New York | By stipulation (CPLR 3113(d))93 | Unless stipulated, the oath-giver “shall be physically present”;93 bill S10374 to change this was in committee94 |
| Florida | By communication technology (Rule 1.310(c)(1))27 | By a person authorized to swear in Florida; an out-of-state witness must consent to a Florida oath95 |
| Illinois | By notice stating the electronic means, subject to objection85 | Not addressed in the sources |
| Massachusetts | The noticing party may take a video-conference deposition45 | Remotely, if the officer “can both see and hear the deponent”45 |
Remote platform settings
Whoever controls the platform controls its recording. NCRA recommends “that the reporter be designated the host whenever possible,” to avoid unauthorized use of the recording feature.47 An MDL deposition order required “a ‘virtual waiting room’ that allows the court reporter to admit only individuals authorized to attend” and a live attendee list.89 Zoom’s security controls include locking the meeting, a waiting room, and suspending participants’ video, audio, and screen sharing.96
Identify yourself and the room. California’s Board asks reporters to put their CSR number in their display name, stay on camera if possible, prefer gallery view, and request no virtual backgrounds; the appearance page “should indicate whether each attendee was remote or in person,” and a “technical difficulty” parenthetical is appropriate.88 A magistrate judge’s sample protocol requires ID “legible on the video record” and says “Conversations in the breakout rooms shall not be recorded.”90
Recording and bots. California’s Board says reporters “may want to remind participants” before going on the record that recording is not permitted unless noticed or agreed by all parties (CCP 2025.330(c)), and should watch for surreptitious recording.88 Illinois says “No recording of a remote electronic means deposition shall be made other than the recording disclosed in the notice of deposition,”85 and Massachusetts says “No person other than the operator/videographer and court reporter may record the deposition by video or audio means.”45 NCRA’s July 2026 guidance warns that “Remote proceedings may implicate multi-state recording consent statutes,” and that AI notetakers may record “even if the platform’s microphone is muted”; its suggested script asks anyone using “AI, recording, or automated summarization tools” to disclose it.97 Two NCRA ethics committee members wrote, not as a formal opinion, that if a party objects, “the reporter cannot proceed with the recording feature enabled.”98 NCRA Advisory Opinion 44 says a reporter “may not act as both the videographer and the verbatim reporter for the same proceeding.”99
When the connection drops. NCRA says to tell the parties on reconnection and “invite the parties to repeat what had been said,” and that chat is not in the record “unless one of the parties reads it into the record.”47
What the platform records.
- Zoom local recording can save “separate audio files for up to 80 participants,” but phone participants “will be merged into one audio file.”20 The host must record or grant permission, and an interrupted conversion after the meeting can leave files “corrupted and non-recoverable.”100
- Zoom’s own pages disagree on cloud recording: the settings page offers per-participant files for “up to 200 speakers,” while the file-format page says per-participant tracks are “(computer recording only).” Test on your account.101102
- A Zoom cloud recording “will only record the main meeting and none of the breakouts will be captured.”103
- In Teams, “Guests can’t record meetings”; non-channel recordings go to the organizer’s OneDrive, and “By default, only meeting organizers and co-organizers can download or delete the recording.”104
- Zoom’s noise suppression defaults to “Auto”; “High” removes “background speech from others”; high-fidelity music mode “disables echo cancellation and post-processing.”105 No source tested how these settings affect a transcript, so we recommend none.
Remote capture, by method
Steno. Stenograph’s Direct Audio, in CATalyst 22 and later, records platform audio when you “select Stenograph Virtual Audio 1 Input as the output (speakers) device” in Zoom or Teams.17 Its files “will only play for users on CATalyst version 22 or higher,” including RealTeam; otherwise use Single Channel audio. For in-person jobs Stenograph warns against sending the live feed to a speaker, because “you would likely experience an echo or other feedback.”17 Direct Audio takes up to eight channels from a hardware mixer with MME or WASAPI drivers, not ASIO, in a proprietary .sgmca format.23 Advantage’s 2021 guide uses Stereo Mix or Voicemeeter, warns “Stereo Mix will not record your voice,” and strongly recommends headphones with Voicemeeter.19 Its Eclipse 12 training describes built-in loopback recording “without third-party software”; we found no manual page for it.106 Windows’ WASAPI loopback works only on shared-mode streams.107
Headphones. Veritext, a national agency, warns its reporters that headphones plugged into the writing laptop can mean “you will lose your CAT software audio,” and suggests testing a USB splitter first.108
Voice. We found no NVRA guidance for remote jobs. Our synthesis, not a published standard: capture platform audio into your voice CAT the same way; keep the mask as your dictation input and never select it as the platform’s microphone; speak to the participants through a separate microphone you can mute; and listen on headphones.
Digital. When you host or may record, Zoom local recording gives “one file for each participant”; ask participants to join by computer audio, since phone audio merges.10020 BlueLedge advises “not relying on the same audio signal or internet connection” for the backup recorder, for example a phone on cellular, and does “not recommend the use of Bluetooth speakers for digital reporters.”21
Remote realtime and exhibits
CaseViewNet Cloud and Bridge Mobile both serve viewers in the room and remote.1878 Send the link only to parties who ordered it: NCRA says uncertified drafts “may only be distributed to ordering parties,”47 and federal realtime likewise.3 For third-party captions in Zoom, the host enables the caption API token and copies it; “Every meeting and breakout room session has a special URL.”109 Gear and dictionary prep are in Realtime Court Reporting.
Illinois excuses sending exhibits ahead if participants “are able to view the exhibits in real time.”85 Veritext says “some remote platforms allow online access to documents for only 24 to 48 hours,” so download marked exhibits during breaks.108 See The State of Exhibit Marking in 2026, and the exhibit number planner for numbering.
Remote connectivity
The Florida Bar’s guide says “A wired internet connection is preferable over a wireless connection.”110 Microsoft says Wi-Fi and VPNs are not necessarily designed for real-time media, and that Teams “prioritizes audio quality over video quality” when bandwidth runs short.111
Bandwidth figures disagree because they answer different questions. Zoom recommends about 1.0 Mbps up and 600 kbps down for high-quality group video and 3.8/3.0 Mbps for 1080p; these are recommendations, not stated minimums.112 One reporting agency asks its reporters for “a minimum bandwidth of 12.0 Mbps upload and 12.0 Mbps download,” about 12 times Zoom’s group-video figure.113 One is a platform’s recommendation; the other, an agency’s headroom.
An NCRA-published column says to buy “a Battery Backup & Surge Protector for your router and your laptop.”22 A Louisiana Judicial College paper, not a court rule, advises keeping “a smartphone hot spot or a telephone dial-in available in case your primary internet fails.”114
Remote pre-flight. DepoStack’s synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard.
- Where the witness is, and whose oath law applies.88
- Host where possible, waiting room on, meeting locked once all are in.4796
- Display name with your license number; a roll for the appearance page.88
- Recording reminder and AI-tool disclosure before going on the record.8897
- Platform audio routed into your CAT or recorder,17 and a test recording played back (our synthesis).
- Headphones tested with the CAT audio.108
- Wired connection; router and laptop on a battery backup; hotspot or dial-in ready.11022114
- Digital: backup recorder on a separate signal and connection.21
Hybrid depositions
In a hybrid room, more than one open device feeds back. An NCRA-published column describes one speakerphone carrying the room and every other device set to “leave computer audio”;22 Veritext’s reporter panel says “‘Leave Audio’ should be used anytime there is more than one device joined to audio conference and feedback is occurring.”24 The rules pull the other way on log-ins: Illinois’ comment says everyone in the room “should separately participate in the videoconference” where possible, and Massachusetts requires that everyone with the deponent “must separately log in.”8545 Our reading: they fit together if everyone logs in for video and identification, and one device carries the room’s audio.
Stenograph documents a two-computer pattern: the reporter’s computer runs CATalyst and the meeting to record audio, and “the additional computer will run just the web conferencing app for the in-person participants.”23 For digital reporters, Veritext’s panel says to “mic the in person participants and then also place a mic near the phone.”24 Michigan’s court procedures say video-conference audio “should be fed directly into the recording system,” or a mic moved near its speaker.115
No source publishes a tested hybrid wiring diagram. This channel plan is DepoStack’s synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard, and untested: try it before a live job.
| Channel or device | Carries | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Channels 1 to 3 | Witness, examining attorney, defending attorney | Each speaking party on their own mic15 |
| Channel 4 | Platform audio fed in, or a mic near the room’s conference speaker | Michigan;115 Veritext24 |
| Reporter’s computer | CAT and the meeting, recording platform audio | Stenograph’s two-computer pattern23 |
| Room computer | The meeting, with the room’s one audio device | One device carries the room22 |
Videotaped depositions
Two records run side by side, and the roles stay separate: NCRA says a reporter “may not act as both the videographer and the verbatim reporter,”99 and it “strongly recommends the use of a Certified Legal Video Specialist (CLVS).”8
On camera. Federally, a non-stenographic recording repeats the opening at each unit of the medium.28 In Florida, “Audiovisually recorded depositions must also be recorded stenographically, unless all parties agree otherwise,” and the officer must, on camera, identify the style of the action, state the date, and swear the witness.27 NCRA’s video standards log “on and off the record” separately from “on and off the video,” and have the videographer keep recording a disputed off-the-record request “until agreement by all counsel.”26
Audio from the videographer. NCRA’s Standard #8 says the videographer “shall be able to provide the court reporter an audio recording which shall be the output from the audio mixer,” but not whether that is a live feed or a file, which connector, or what level.26 Agree on it before the job. The standards also call for at least four microphones, three of them lavaliers, automatic gain off, and continuous headphone monitoring.26
Timestamps. Stenograph’s “Set Time” format symbol is for when “you need to synchronize timestamps with a videographer.”25 Advantage says Eclipse can match a separate digital recorder’s timecodes to the writer’s; that page addresses audio, not video.116 Sync formats and designations are in The State of Deposition Video Sync in 2026.
What you did not hear. NCRA Advisory Opinion 47: “A reporter should not include conversations unless they were actually heard and reported by the reporter,” except by written agreement of all parties, marked as a video excerpt.117
Voice writers near video mics. We found no source. Our synthesis: before going on the record, listen to the video track while you dictate at working level. If you are audible, fix the seal or move.
Court hearings and trials
Realtime to the bench
The federal program says court sessions “shall be recorded verbatim by shorthand, stenotype, stenomask, or electronic sound recording equipment,” as the district judge elects.118 Only certified realtime reporters (NCRA’s CRR or an equivalent exam) may sell realtime at Conference rates, and realtime is not required in all proceedings.3 Unless the court has a permanent router, the realtime reporter supplies the wiring, connectors, adapters, and router; parties bring “their own computers, viewer/annotation software, and monitors” and “should coordinate and pre-test their equipment with the realtime reporter”; and “Non-judiciary participants may not receive access to the DCN at any time.”3 Federal realtime is labelled “Realtime Unedited Transcript Only,” carries no appearance, index, or certification page, goes only to ordering parties, and may not be used where a certified transcript is required.3
Local courts write their own specs. Fresno County Superior Court’s mandatory standard does not support wireless realtime, requires a wired serial link with settings matched at both ends, and says court technicians do not directly support reporter-owned equipment; the details are in Realtime Court Reporting.29 For a bench conference, know which writer link survives unplugging (Core kit: steno).
Federal official qualifications are set in a volume of the Guide that is not public. One 2026 posting in the Western District of Texas required NCRA’s RPR “or … an equivalent qualifying examination* such as the Certified Verbatim Reporter (CVR),” preferred realtime certification, and required the reporter to own realtime equipment; it survives only in an archive capture.119
Officials’ backup audio
The rules in Where audio becomes the record govern: personal property in federal court unless filed as the record of an arraignment, plea, or sentencing; never backed up by the court’s system; and in Minnesota, a court-owned backup is required.351 California requires official reporters who keep notes in non-paper form to store “one duplicate backup copy” and review the media for obsolescence.120
Digital in the courtroom
In court, a digital reporter usually runs the court’s installed system, and federal policy says it produces “No simultaneous text or transcript … beyond the recorder’s log notes.”3 The standards:
- Federal: four channels minimum (suspendable where not advantageous), channel isolation, monitoring from the recorded signal, log notes stamped when begun, non-proprietary export, an off-line backup plan, and emergency fallbacks.3
- California: at least four channels and four microphones that, absent unusual circumstances, “must be directional (cardioid),” with earphones on the recorded signal; the rule’s text still describes older media.121 The statute limits electronic recording to limited civil, misdemeanor, and infraction cases without a reporter and bars “an unofficial record”;122 since August 10, 2026, courts must give indigent civil litigants, on request, “meaningful access in all cases to an official verbatim record,” “including by means of electronic recording” if no reporter is available.123 Contra Costa and Santa Clara then rescinded their electronic-recording general orders.124125
- NCSC: a default channel map (“1 - Judge/Jury/Bench or Well 2 - Witness 3 - Defendant 4 - Plaintiff”); the monitor should “Interrupt the proceeding and notify the Judge when a record is not being made,” using “best judgment”; and sidebars are recorded “unless the Judge orders otherwise.”34
- Arizona: “Toggling mute buttons must not be used on microphones,” though mics that mute only while held are allowed, and systems must be capable of confidence monitoring.31
- Michigan: store the signal “to two separate storage devices simultaneously,” with “at least visual indication” that each microphone is picking up a signal.126
- Florida: in the Eighteenth Circuit, digital court reporters monitor and “immediately signal or notify the trial judge” when quality is in question, and digital reporting is barred as the system in capital cases, as the statewide rule also requires.2127
- Georgia: Rule 36.19 requires multichannel recording, digital backups, and “microphones on counsel tables that are individually mutable by the user”; it “does not apply to depositions.”52
- Texas: an October 2026 study, not a rule, recommends “multi-channel audio capture with voice isolation, real-time confidence monitoring by a trained court recorder, time-stamped log notes, redundant backup of audio files, and a defined retention period.”56
Daily and expedited copy
Federal daily copy is due “on the calendar day following receipt of the order,” before the clerk’s office opens, and hourly copy “within two hours”; those rates cover “extra court reporters, typists, and transcribers.”3 When the court cannot provide expedited delivery, a judge may allow a private reporter to make “an unofficial expedited record.”3 Stenograph’s RealTeam shares text and audio with scopists and proofreaders while you write; it needs CATalyst V20 or later, a support plan, and internet.128 For due dates, use the turnaround date calculator.
Arbitrations, EUOs, IMEs, and meetings
The evidence for these jobs is thin. California’s definition of shorthand reporting reaches “any oral court proceeding, deposition, court ordered hearing or arbitration.”129 AAERT’s CER description covers “depositions, EUOs, statements on the record, aids of execution, meetings, arbitrations,” while its CDR description lists EUOs and statements but not meetings or arbitrations.6 We found no setup guidance specific to these jobs. Our synthesis: your deposition setup carries over; settle at booking who hired you, what the record is for, and who gets copies.
Medical content and HIPAA
In California, an examinee’s attorney may “record stenographically or by audio technology any words spoken to or by the examinee,” and examiner and examinee may audio-record a mental examination; other states were not researched.130131 A HIPAA qualified protective order must bar use outside the litigation and require “the return to the covered entity or destruction of the protected health information (including all copies made).”32 HHS says a lawyer who is a business associate must ensure “litigation support personnel, or others hired by the lawyer to assist the lawyer” protect health information; it does not name court reporters.132 Whether a given reporter is a business associate is fact-specific, so ask hiring counsel how the order applies to your notes, audio, and copies. Our reading: the copies to return or destroy include backups. California’s Board says to delete scanned documents “from all backup sources,”133 and CATalyst’s cloud backup keeps files deleted in CATalyst.134
Multi-day litigation
RealTeam shares text and audio with your team while you write,128 but Direct Audio files play only on CATalyst 22 or later, so confirm your scopist’s version.17 NCSC suggests taking appearances “at the start of each day” of a multi-day trial and keeping “a separate word list with the spelling of proper nouns and technical jargon.”34
Interpreted proceedings
California’s Board says “THE COURT REPORTER BEGINS BY SWEARING IN THE INTERPRETER” and the reporter “must make the record clear as to which language is used.”33 A bilingual reporter “is not to interrupt to correct the interpretation,” but must interrupt if no record is being created, and “it is often very helpful to the interpreter to have access to a realtime screen.”33 For voice writers, Talk Technologies’ manual describes “lagging,” waiting several words before repeating to cut false starts;66 our suggestion is to use it with interpreted answers too. Transcript conventions are in The Art of the Transcript.
Modes. In federal proceedings instituted by the United States, interpretation is simultaneous for parties and “consecutive mode for witnesses” unless the judge orders otherwise, and on a party’s motion the judge decides whether to require an electronic sound recording.135 Washington’s comment says consecutive mode for a witness “allows for the English interpretation to be on the record,” and requires consecutive interpretation when remote technology cannot carry simultaneous.136 Iowa requires courts to record testimony given through an interpreter in a language other than English.137
Channels. NCSC says the interpreter’s microphone goes on “a channel that is not the same as the channel assigned to the witness,” muted carefully “to ensure that a witness’s private conversations are not recorded”;34 Michigan says the same.115
Remote. Zoom cloud recordings keep the original audio and, with a setting on, “an audio file for each language interpretation”; local recordings capture only what the recorder hears; and phone users cannot hear interpretation.138 In Teams, “The interpreter’s audio will not be present on the recording,”139 and Webex recordings “only capture the original audio.”140 California’s remote-interpreting guidelines favor simultaneous-capable solutions and headsets, and do not recommend speakerphones; they do not address court reporters.141
CART and captioning
CART is a separate job from the official record. Federal policy says the CART provider “must not be the court reporter taking the official record,”3 and NCRA’s captioner code says to “Refrain from working in the dual capacity of official reporter of proceedings and CART captioner at the same time,” and to disclose it on the record if it cannot be avoided.142
Files. In a legal setting, “No file is to be provided unless by order of the Court.”142 NCRA’s CART manual makes preserving the unedited file, with a disclaimer, for “no fewer than five years” the default, but in a confidential setting such as jury deliberations or attorney-client talk, the display “should not be visible to others” and the captioner “should delete all files immediately after the assignment unless requested not to do so or ordered by the Court.”35
Kit and display. The manual’s kit includes an “additional realtime cable,” CAT with “text-enlarging capability,” a “surge protector with indicator light,” and gaffer tape, with “Backup equipment, computer, and software key/code” readily available. It says to test compatibility before agreeing to display on external equipment, to blank the display while making job defines, and that “Brackets should not appear around untranslated words.” For audio, it suggests pulling audio “off the audio mixer board with headphones”; for remote CART, a designated URL with “emergency contact capability.”35
Backup and timing. NCRA’s 2016 guidelines say a captioner “should have a backup computer and steno machine,” name a UPS or generator as backup power, and say to be set up 30 to 60 minutes early on site, or 10 to 15 minutes early remotely.143
The legal frame. Under ADA Title II, auxiliary aids include “real-time computer-aided transcription services” and “real-time captioning,”37 and public entities “shall give primary consideration to the requests of individuals with disabilities.”144 Federal court policy is in tension with that. Volume 5 of the Guide limits court CART to “a video display of spoken words,” “not to be used instead of conventional means of producing the official record,” yet says courts “should honor a participant’s choice of auxiliary aid or service” unless an equally effective alternative exists or the choice would be an undue burden.145 Volume 6 says CART should be approved “only after alternatives that are more cost effective have been considered.”3 Volume 5’s exception partly reconciles the two.
By method. NCRA’s CRC is a five-minute literary test at 180 wpm and 96 percent plus a written test, for “current or aspiring stenographic captioners.”146 NVRA describes CART as produced with “speech-to-text software, a computer, and either an open or closed microphone or stenotype machine”;147 its RCP-M exam runs up to 225 wpm at 97.5 percent with a “standard drop down rate of 5 seconds or less,” taken on a “stable Internet connection, preferably hardwired.”36 For digital reporters, no source we read treats a recording as CART. That is a gap in the sources, not a judgment; the ADA list names real-time transcription and captioning,37 and federal court CART is a live display.145 See also CART vs. deposition realtime.
CART booking sheet. DepoStack’s synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard.
- Who hired you, and that you are not also the official reporter.3142
- File disposition, in writing: none without a court order in a legal setting; kept or deleted by setting.14235
- External display tested before you accept; display hidden during confidential talk.35
- Audio from the room’s mixer or an assistive listening device.35
- Backup computer, writer, software key, and power.143
- Arrival 30 to 60 minutes early on site, 10 to 15 remotely.143
- A signal, agreed with the consumer, for when text stops (our synthesis; no source sets one).
Realtime and rough drafts
The federal program defines realtime as “A draft unedited transcript produced by a certified realtime reporter as a byproduct of realtime.”118 Who can produce it is contested. NCRA’s position: “Stenographic reporters and voice writers can provide this service; digital recorders/transcriptionists cannot.”148 Stenograph says its MAXScribe “enables digital reporters to offer realtime reporting,”149 and For The Record says its RealTime Go “produces accurate, real-time transcripts.”150 We did not verify those claims, and no source we read shows such text accepted as certified realtime. Federal policy: a digital audio system produces no simultaneous text beyond the log notes.3 If a client orders realtime from a digital reporter, tell the client before the job that the recording will not produce live text (our suggestion).
By method. NCRA’s CRR is a five-minute realtime Q&A at 96 percent, and candidates “cannot edit your transcript at all before uploading.”38 NVRA’s RVR is one of three eight-minute segments at 180 wpm and 95 percent, the RVR-M an eight-minute 200 wpm Q&A at 96 percent, both “utilizing a closed microphone system.”405 Stenograph says CATalyst VP’s “Dragon-Faster-Drop” “puts the text on the screen faster than Dragon operating alone.”151 Gear and dictionary prep are in Realtime Court Reporting.
Rough drafts. NCRA says “An uncertified transcript may not be filed with the court,” “may only be distributed to ordering parties,” “may be provided in condensed format only,” and the signed disclaimer should be kept.47 California’s Board allows a changed line count with labels instead, and says a draft should state it is “unedited and uncertified,” “should never include a completed title page, appearance, index, or certification page,” and should have “All untranslated steno strokes/undefined voice commands” resolved before delivery.39 The two differ on format; both keep drafts apart from the certified transcript. California’s statute says a rough draft “may not be certified.”152 Offer the same services to every party.47 For draft versus certified text in review, see The State of Scoping and Transcript Review in 2026. The transcript invoice estimator has a realtime per-page line.
Field and restricted sites
No power and travel
The FAA says spare lithium batteries and power banks “must be carried in carry-on baggage only,” limits rechargeable batteries to “100 watt hours (Wh) per battery” without airline approval (up to two spares of 101 to 160 Wh with approval), and forbids batteries over 160 Wh; airlines “may have stricter” limits.153154
Stenograph says its NexGen runs “approximately 12 hours and then will go into FailSafe mode which may last up to 3” hours.9 In FailSafe, the Luminex II keeps notes, audio, and USB realtime going with the screen and radios off.41 Our reading: on a long day without an outlet, USB keeps realtime alive longest. A writer powered over USB draws on the laptop’s battery instead.59 Recorders lose runtime fast with load (see the battery table).42 Practitioner advice in NCRA’s journal: “Have two of everything,” and “Never count on an outlet being close.”87
Jails and prisons
The Bureau of Prisons limits a legal visitor’s power cord to six feet, bars recording “Unless specifically authorized in advance,” requires wireless off or airplane mode, and prohibits connecting to its network.155 The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s laptop form says the department “is not obligated to provide a power source” and bars phones and hotspots; it names attorneys and certain representatives but not court reporters.156 California’s prison system requires the attorney’s request to include the reporter’s date of birth, Social Security number, and driver’s license number, and makes the attorney responsible for telling the reporter the entry requirements.157 A federal deposition of a person “confined in prison” requires leave of court.28 We found no published hospital or bedside equipment policy.
No-outlet day. DepoStack’s synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard.
- The writer fully charged, its FailSafe behavior known.41
- A spare SD card.41
- Laptop power settings checked before you leave.158
- Recorder runtime budgeted for your actual load.4243
- Spare batteries in your carry-on, 100 Wh or less each unless approved.153
- Two of everything essential, chargers first.87
- For a prison: entry requirements from the attorney, approval for each device and any recording, and a short cord.157155
Audio capture
Microphones and placement
NCSC warns that omnidirectional mics “turn a sophisticated multi-channel recording system into a mono recording system” and that cardioid is the most common directional choice.34 California’s court rule requires microphones that, absent unusual circumstances, “must be directional (cardioid).”121 Yet “Most lav mics feature an omnidirectional capsule,”83 and NCRA’s video standards still call for three lavaliers.26 Placement figures from the makers are in the in-person placement table. NCSC adds: “Request that a person stop tapping a microphone or shuffling papers too close to it.”34
Channels
AAERT’s white paper explains why isolation matters: “By isolating the recording to one channel at a time, the transcriptionist can listen to one speaker at a time to determine what was spoken and by whom.”159 Federal policy sets four channels as the courtroom minimum, suspendable where not advantageous, such as telephone proceedings.3 AAERT’s blog says a jury trial needs at least four if channels can be shared, and “Miking each location individually would require 8-9 channels!”15 Isolation can be lost downstream: Zoom merges phone participants into one file,20 Amazon’s transcription service says “Media with more than two channels is not currently supported,”160 and Google advises sending each speaker’s channel “separately.”161
Levels and processing
Zoom Corporation’s H6 manual says “Adjust so that the peak level stays around −12dB”; TASCAM’s DR-40X manual says to keep the meter “centered on -12 without causing the PEAK indicator to light red.” One is a peak, the other a meter centre.162163 AAERT puts good levels “between -12 dB and -6 dB” and says above 0 dB “your audio will clip.”15 Both recorders offer a quieter safety file: the H6 only for its L/R input, 12 dB lower; the DR-40X’s DUAL REC at −6 to −12 dB. On the H6, “When set to MP3, a stereo mix will be recorded regardless of the number of tracks.”162163 Zoom Corporation’s H6essential manual says its 32-bit float design records “both loud and quiet sounds without making gain adjustments”; Windows needs a driver to use it as an interface.164 Our reading: that protects the converter, not a badly placed mic.
The sources disagree on automatic gain and noise processing, because their goals differ. NCSC says court systems must provide “Noise filtration and automatic gain control”; NCRA’s video standards set automatic gain “to the ‘off’ position”; and Google says “Don’t use automatic gain control (AGC)” and “All noise reduction processing should be disabled” for recognition.3426161 For voice writers, Stenograph says to turn Dragon’s automatic level off.12
Formats
Federal policy has “no approved file formats,” names WAV as “non-proprietary,” and requires non-proprietary export.3 Arizona lists “AVI, MPEG/MP3, FLAC, or WAV playable by non-proprietary readers.”31 Florida’s court standard sets “a minimum sampling rate of 44.1KHz at 16 bits,” and is internally inconsistent on whether a courtroom needs eight channels or four.165 Google asks for 16,000 Hz or higher and “a lossless codec.”161 CAT defaults can sit lower: Case CATalyst’s default codec is “ADPCM 8000 Hz,” with “PCM 48000 Hz” available at much larger sizes.166 Our reading: if anyone else will work from your audio, check its format and rate before the job.
Monitoring
Listen to the recording, not the room. Federal monitoring uses “the already recorded signal … (not the signal directly from the microphones)”;3 Michigan’s manual says the operator “listens to the recording, not the source”;115 and Michigan’s standards require “at least visual indication” that each mic is live.126 AAERT says without “confidence monitoring,” “it’s impossible to detect and correct any technical issues.”167 BlueLedge says never to use noise-cancelling headphones in a proceeding.16
Recording laws apply to everyone’s audio. California’s Board cites “California Penal Code 632, which prohibits eavesdropping on or recording confidential communications.”46
Power and redundancy
Writer and recorder batteries
Makers’ own figures under the conditions they state, not our tests.
| Device | Maker’s figure | Conditions and notes |
|---|---|---|
| Stenograph NexGen writer | About 12 hours, then FailSafe up to 3 | All features on9 |
| Stenograph Luminex II writer | FailSafe up to 3 hours | Screen and radios off; notes and audio to both SD cards; realtime over USB only41 |
| Stenograph Wave and Diamante writers | About 8 to 10 hours main, plus about 8 hours backup battery | Guides from 2017 and 201458168 |
| ProCAT Xpression writer | “16+ hours” | Vendor marketing claim60 |
| Stenovations LightSpeed Zenith writer | No figure; powered over USB | Draws on the laptop59 |
| Zoom Corporation H6essential recorder | About 18 hours (2 tracks); about 3.5 hours (6 tracks, headphones) | Alkaline, phantom off; its headline “10 hours” does not match its own 2-track figure42 |
| TASCAM Portacapture X8 recorder | About 11 hours; about 5.5 hours | Built-in mics, no phantom; then two inputs on +48V phantom; alkaline43 |
Laptop and CAT settings
Stenograph tells CATalyst users to set Windows to Best Performance on battery and plugged in, set sleep and lid actions to Never, and stop Windows from powering down USB root hubs.158 Autosave differs by program. Case CATalyst saves at a user-set interval, which Stenograph recommends be at least five minutes, and keeps the original after an abnormal end (guide version 18, 2017).169 Total Eclipse “saves to disk each time the cursor moves out of a paragraph,” with timed auto-backup.170 ProCAT’s Autosave “only makes a copy” in a .SAV file.171 StenoCAT updates “your transcript and audio in both locations.”172 We found no documentation of DigitalCAT’s transcript autosave.
Backups and retention
Stenograph recommends storing backups “off of your computer like an external hard drive or the cloud.”173 CATalyst Cloud Backup pauses “during realtime,”174 and files deleted in CATalyst stay in the cloud backup.134 For recordings, Michigan requires storing the signal to two devices at once,126 and Arizona requires daily backups, saying “Simultaneous storage is not a substitute.”31
Retention follows the governing law. California requires deposition notes to be kept at least eight years when no transcript is produced, or one year after a transcript is produced.175 The bodies’ defaults differ: NCRA “no less than five (5) years,”47 AAERT “no less than three years” for recordings,176 and NVRA defers to “rule, statute or court order.”177 Advantage’s audio page assumes “you’ll delete the sound files when you’re finished transcribing,”116 which conflicts with NCRA’s guidance that backup audio be preserved on request “for the same period of time for which the reporter’s notes are preserved.”47
Two of everything. DepoStack’s synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard.
- Notes in two places, plus a copy off the computer.41173
- A main recording and an independent battery recorder.1516
- USB and Bluetooth paired for the writer.10
- Charged batteries, and a battery backup for router and laptop.22
- Wired internet, and a hotspot or dial-in number.110114
- Spare chargers, cables, a power strip with a long cord, and tape.878035
- Autosave on, at an interval you have checked.169
Security and confidentiality
Codes and rules
NCRA’s code requires members to “Preserve the confidentiality and ensure the security of information”;178 AAERT’s uses nearly the same words and adds “Do not discuss remarks heard on or off the record with anyone”;176 NVRA’s says “Preserve confidentiality; respect privileged information.”177 NCRA’s position on outsourcing says accountability for security and confidentiality passes with the work “to the scopist, proofreader, transcriptionist, production facility, or whomever.”8 California makes confidentiality an enforceable standard for licensees.179
Device and file security
California’s Board advises strong passwords on external drives, “multifactor authentication (MFA) whenever possible,” backups to “encrypted cloud services or password-protected drives,” and sending transcripts and exhibits by “encrypted email or file transfer services”; deleting scanned documents “from all backup sources” when done; a retention policy; and wiping devices before disposal. It is guidance, not a basis for discipline.133 Microsoft says Windows device encryption “doesn’t encrypt external/USB drives,” and a device with only local accounts “remains unprotected even though the data is encrypted.”180 Federal policy asks for current antivirus, passwords, and offsite backups, and its digital-audio security plans cover “sending unencrypted files over the internet” and “unauthorized listening to sealed or other sensitive court proceedings.”3 Florida’s court systems must support sealing with “user authorization, encryption, and seal keys,” and NCSC calls for “record-over protection.”16534 AAERT’s exams test “the chain of custody of the digital reporter’s audio, job information, and exhibits.”53181 At the table, one practitioner’s answer to a lawyer reading over her shoulder was a privacy filter.87
AI tools and bots
NCRA’s AI guidance says “There must be no unauthorized transcript uploading, data sharing, storage, or reuse of proceeding content,” and, on summaries, “Do not input prompts or analytical instructions into AI tools.”5497 Read a cloud service’s terms first: Amazon’s transcription service, for one, “may temporarily store your content to continuously improve the quality of its analysis models.”160 For bots that join a remote proceeding, see Remote platform settings.
Releasing audio
If you release backup audio, NCRA says “release a copy and not the original (unless ordered otherwise by a court),” make the same offer to every party, and make sure no confidential or off-the-record talk is in it.47 California’s Board says backup audio for a sealed or confidential transcript should be “clearly labeled,” and the original kept “for no less than one year.”46
Rules and credentials
Rules by jurisdiction
As of October 13, 2026. Each cell cites the rule it states. “Not addressed in the sources” means the sources we read did not address it; it is not a finding that a method is barred. Rows marked in flux have a pending case, a new rule, or a recent bill.
| Jurisdiction | Stenographic deposition | Voice-writing deposition | Digital deposition | Court record | Licensing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal | Allowed; the notice states the method28 | Not addressed by name; Rule 30 allows “audio, audiovisual, or stenographic means”28 | Audio or audiovisual allowed unless the court orders otherwise28 | Shorthand, stenotype, stenomask, or electronic sound recording, as the judge elects118 | Not addressed in the sources as a license; one 2026 posting required the RPR or an equivalent such as the CVR119 |
| California (in flux) | Default, by a CSR, unless the parties agree or the court orders otherwise14 | Voice writing is a CSR method since April 1, 2024182129 | Only by agreement or court order;14 a 2025 digital-recorder bill failed in February 2026, per the CalMatters tracker183 | Statute limits electronic recording to limited civil, misdemeanor, and infraction cases;122 since August 10, 2026, indigent civil litigants get access in all cases123 | CSR license184 |
| Texas (in flux) | Depositions “must be reported by a certified shorthand reporter,” with exceptions185 | CSRs certified in “oral stenography”185 | Any party may add non-stenographic recording on notice; a court may require a certified transcript;86 In re Hughey pending57 | Not addressed in the sources as a rule; a 2026 OCA study recommends monitored multichannel recording56 | JBCC certification186 |
| Florida | “taken stenographically or audiovisually recorded”27 | Unresolved: “stenomask equipment” counts as court reporting, but no authority on “stenographic” under Rule 1.31012727 | Audiovisual, plus a steno record unless all parties agree27 | By circuit; the Eighteenth Circuit’s digital recording is the official record unless a state-paid reporter is present;2 none in capital cases127 | No statewide licensing or registry (2019 analysis)187 |
| New York | “stenographic or other means”93 | Not addressed by name; “other means” allowed93 | “other means” allowed93 | Not addressed in the sources | No state license (SONAR, self-reported, 2024)188 |
| Illinois | Allowed85 | Not addressed for depositions; voice licensure not accepted30 | Sound or audio-visual recording allowed; the notice names the operator85 | Not addressed in the sources | Shorthand license; voice-writing and audio or video licensure “will not be accepted”30 |
| Georgia (in flux) | Required unless the court orders otherwise44 | Not addressed in the sources; NVRA-tested reporters certified in that method189 | Only “in addition,” unless the court orders otherwise44 | Superior courts: Rule 36.19 digital recording from February 26, 202652 | NCRA, NVRA, Georgia’s exam, or AAERT’s CER and CET, in the method tested190189 |
| Tennessee (re-check) | Not addressed in the sources | Not addressed in the sources | Not addressed in the sources | No court reporter required by the licensing law, but one used must be licensed191 | Licenses by method, including voice and electronic; RPR, CVR, or CER and CET192193 |
| Massachusetts | Always, unless the parties stipulate otherwise45 | Not addressed in the sources | Audiovisual may be added; otherwise by stipulation45 | Not addressed in the sources | Not addressed in the sources |
| Arizona and Nevada | Not addressed in the sources | Not addressed in the sources | Arizona’s statute “does not apply to other means of recording”194 | Arizona: momentary mutes, confidence monitoring, open formats, daily backup31 | Both certify stenographic and voice reporters only194195 |
| Washington and Oregon | Not addressed in the sources | Not addressed in the sources | Not addressed in the sources | Washington accepts AAERT certification for transcribers of court recordings196 | Washington certifies steno and stenomask, without restricting “alternate technology”;197 Oregon’s voicewriting includes speech recognition198 |
| Louisiana (in flux) | Not addressed in the sources | Not addressed in the sources | Not addressed in the sources | A 2026 bill for “a digital transcription platform” in all court proceedings deferred, 11-0199 | Not addressed in the sources |
NVRA says voice writers may practice in the state courts of most states and marks Montana, Vermont, and Wyoming “Freelance only,” but its two published lists do not match and its state-requirements PDF no longer loads; it also says “The rules for Federal Courts allow for machine writers, voice writers, and digital recorders.” Verify state by state.2005
Credentials by method
| Method | Credential | What it tests or requires |
|---|---|---|
| Stenographic | NCRA RPR / RMR | 180, 200, and 225 wpm (RMR: 200, 240, 260) at 95 percent per leg4201 |
| Stenographic | NCRA CRR | Five-minute realtime Q&A at 200 wpm, 96 percent, no editing; RPR or higher38 |
| Stenographic | NCRA CRC | Five-minute literary at 180 wpm, 96 percent, plus a written test; for captioners146 |
| Voice writing | NVRA CVR / CM | Three five-minute segments at 180, 200, and 225 wpm (CM: 200, 240, 260) at 95 percent; reciprocity for NCRA holders ended December 31, 20245 |
| Voice writing | NVRA RVR / RVR-M | Eight-minute realtime segments (180 wpm, 95 percent; 200 wpm, 96 percent), closed microphone40 |
| Voice writing | NVRA RCP-M | CART, up to 225 wpm at 97.5 percent36 |
| Digital | AAERT CER, CDR, CET | Digital capture, depositions, transcription; CET practical at 95 percent since March 26, 2026; CER practical announced6202 |
| Digital | AAERT eligibility | Notary-eligible, high-school diploma; renew every three years; certifications stay valid under the 2026 CAPTUR merger6203 |
| Video | NCRA CLVS | Seven-module workshop, written exam, production exam at a staged deposition204 |
| California | CSR | Four-voice 200 wpm dictation at 95 percent; CVR holders exempt since January 1, 2025205184 |
| Texas | CSR (JBCC) | Dictation (“oral”) exam at 225, 200, and 180 wpm, 95 percent per section; endorsement excludes association certificates186206 |
| Georgia, Tennessee | State certificate or license | NCRA, NVRA, or AAERT exams, by method190193 |
| Federal officials | Court posting | RPR or an equivalent such as the CVR (one 2026 posting);119 CRR or equivalent to sell realtime3 |
Positions of professional bodies
NCRA. Its president wrote in 2023 that “a stenographic court reporter is the best means of ensuring that the record is protected.”207 Its 2023 white paper says “there is no universal standard” for digital recording equipment and that transcripts by someone other than the recorder “make chain of custody difficult to track”;208 federal policy and Washington’s GR 35 expressly provide for separate transcribers.3196 An NCRA advocacy flyer says recordings “can be riddled with inaudible statements” and that “The only requirement for digital recorders is a few hours of training and becoming a notary public.”148 That is NCRA’s position. It conflicts with AAERT’s certification exams, whose CET practical is a four-channel mock proceeding scored at 95 percent,6 and with Tennessee’s licensing, which licenses electronic reporters on AAERT’s CER and CET.193
NVRA. “This standard is equivalent to those set by the National Court Reporters Association (NCRA) for stenographers.”209
AAERT. It distinguishes certified digital reporting from unmonitored recording.167 It calls professional oversight, not the tool, “The true gold standard.”55 Its 2025 industry report urges “regulatory updates that remove barriers to digital reporting” and reports stenographers down 21 percent in a decade, to about 23,000; those are AAERT’s figures, and we did not review its methodology.210
Others. The Speech-to-Text Institute’s archived pages say “no single technology holds exclusivity on such quality”; its current status is unverified.211 Texas’s 2026 survey found about 8.9 percent of court reporters, against about 69 percent of court recorders, agreed that digital recording is as accurate as a stenographic reporter; that measures belief, not accuracy.56 And the California Supreme Court declined to compare: “a verbatim record created by electronic recording is better than no record at all.”123
In flux
- Texas. The Supreme Court of Texas heard argument in In re Hughey on October 6, 2026, on whether a trial court abused its discretion in striking a non-stenographically recorded, AI-generated deposition transcript; as of October 13, 2026, it was “Submitted (Awaiting Opinion).”57 Below, the trial court struck the transcript but not the video, and the court of appeals denied mandamus without deciding the statutory question.212 The 2023 law that changed “recorded” to “reported” includes an uncodified clause saying its Article 10 “is and shall be construed to be consistent with” the rules allowing non-stenographic recording.213
- California. Los Angeles’s and San Diego’s responses to the August 10 decision were not found.123
- Georgia. Rule 36.19 took effect February 26, 2026,52 and the scope of an AAERT-based Georgia certificate is not stated.189
- Louisiana. HB 188 was deferred in committee on March 26, 2026.199
- New York. S10374 was “In Senate Committee.”94
- AAERT. A 2026 Best Practices Guide is announced,77 and the CAPTUR merger was ratified in 2026.203
- Minnesota. A revision of the backup policy after the 2024 text likely exists.51
What we could not verify
- Dragon 16’s lifecycle: no end date on Nuance’s pages.70
- Speechmatics data terms in Advantage’s published terms.74
- Windows 11 support for Talk Technologies or Martel masks and the Andrea USB adapter.67
- Zoom cloud per-participant audio: Zoom’s pages disagree.102
- Florida and voice writing under Rule 1.310.27
- Georgia’s AAERT-based certificate: its scope of practice.189
- Hospitals: no published equipment policy; jails beyond three sites not researched.
- AAERT’s Best Practices Guide: the paid 2019 edition was not reviewed.77
- Reporters under HIPAA: no HHS statement on whether a reporter is a business associate.132
- Platform audio processing: no source tested its effect on transcripts.105
- Hybrid wiring and remote voice writing: no tested diagram, and no NVRA guidance.
- NCRA Standard #8: feed, connector, and level unspecified.26
- Federal officials: whether NVRA’s RVR counts as an equivalent realtime exam.119
- Tennessee: the effect of a 2025 law restructuring its board; the statute was read on FindLaw.192
- One writer’s battery figure: its maker gives two numbers, so it is not in the table.
Build your checklist
The setup picker turns this guide into a job sheet: choose your method and job, and print a checklist where every line links back to the section that sources it.
The gear changes with the method and the job. The signature does not. The reporter or the transcriber certifies the record; the software never does.
Sources
Sources reviewed
- Court Reporters Board of California, Best Practice Pointer No. 1, How to Interrupt Proceedings courtreportersboard.ca.gov · revised 3/2025; the Board's pointers are guidance, not regulations · PDF abc
- Eighteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida, Administrative Order 26-04, In re: Court Reporting flcourts18.org · signed January 8, 2026; supersedes AO 25-25 abc
- Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 6: Court Reporting (Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts) uscourts.gov · Chs. 1, 2, 4, 5 last revised October 5, 2026; Ch. 3 November 3, 2023; Appx. 3A October 24, 2016 and Appx. 3C February 18, 2015 (minor changes July 23, 2021): §§ 260.60, 290.20.20, 310.20.30, 320.20.10, 320.30, 320.50, 320.60.20, 350, 460, 510.17, 510.40.10, 520.63.30, 530; Appx. 3A, 3C. Same text also read at uscourts.gov/file/2854/download · PDF abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz27282930313233
- NCRA, Registered Professional Reporter ncra.org ab
- NVRA, Certifications nvra.org · accessed October 13, 2026: CVR, CM, RVR, RVR-M, RCP-M, RBC-M; also carries NVRA's second state-practice list (differs from where-voice-writers-practice) abcd
- AAERT, Certification Program aaert.org · accessed October 13, 2026: CER, CDR, and CET exams and eligibility abcdef
- 28 U.S.C. § 753, Reporters (Legal Information Institute) law.cornell.edu · subsection (b) ab
- NCRA Policies and Procedures Manual, Section 11, Position Statements ncra.org · NCRA Artificial Intelligence (AI) Position Statement; Ensuring the Confidentiality and Security of Outsourced Transcription; CLVS recommendation abc
- Stenograph, NexGen User Guide solutioncenter.stenograph.com · updated April 2, 2024; PDF linked from the Solution Center page (https://static.helpjuice.com/helpjuice_production/uploads/upload/image/9963/3947740/1712073110389-NexGen%2BUser%2BGuide.pdf); also the source of C19's bench-conference USB quote abcdefg
- Journal of Court Reporting (NCRA), TECH TIPS: The most valuable tool of the trade: The steno writer thejcr.com · Lynette Mueller (NCRA Technology Committee member, freelance reporter), August 22, 2022; summarizes vendor writer-training webinars; practitioner guidance abcd
- Stenograph, CaseViewNet FAQ stenograph.com · accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- Stenograph Solution Center, Getting Started with CATalyst VP solutioncenter.helpjuice.com · updated August 28, 2026 abcdefgh
- Talk Technologies, Steno Pro-2S talktech.com · accessed October 13, 2026; talktechnologies.com is a parked domain abcdef
- California Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.330 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · subdivisions (b) and (c); text read on california.public.law (official site blocked) abcd
- AAERT, Turning up the Levels on your Audio Skills aaert.org · published August 13, 2024, modified August 14, 2025 (per AAERT's WordPress API; the page shows no date); refers to AAERT's Best Practices Guide, which we did not review abcdefghij
- BlueLedge, Essential Tools for Becoming a Digital Court Reporter, Part 1: In-Person Proceedings blueledge.com · Benjamin Jaffe, April 22, 2021; training-provider guidance abcdefgh
- Stenograph Solution Center, Direct Audio (Multi-Channel Audio) solutioncenter.stenograph.com · updated April 3, 2024; CATalyst 22 and later abcde
- Stenograph, CaseViewNet Cloud for Any CAT User (flyer) stenograph.com · 2026 (PDF modified May 7, 2026) · PDF abc
- Advantage Software, Web Meeting Audio and Captioning Setup for Eclipse eclipsecat.com · PDF dated January 1, 2021; mentions features of Eclipse version 9 or higher · PDF ab
- Zoom Support, Changing settings in the Zoom Workplace desktop and mobile app (KB0060612) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 12, 2026; crawler-served page abcd
- BlueLedge, Essential Tools for Becoming a Digital Court Reporter, Part 2: Remote Proceedings blueledge.com · Benjamin Jaffe, April 22, 2021; training-provider guidance abc
- Journal of Court Reporting (NCRA), Zoom depositions and court reporters: Seven lessons we've learned since March thejcr.com · Lynette L. Mueller, November 2, 2020; practitioner guidance abcdef
- Stenograph Solution Center, Direct Audio FAQ solutioncenter.stenograph.com · updated March 27, 2024 abcd
- Veritext, Hybrid Depositions: Preparation, Tools and Tactics, Your Questions Answered info.veritext.com · FAQ from webinars of August 24 and 26, 2021; agency panel · PDF abcd
- Stenograph Solution Center, Set Time Format Symbol solutioncenter.helpjuice.com · updated December 2, 2021 ab
- NCRA, Standards for Video Depositions (CLVS Standards) ncra.org · file version v-010716 (January 7, 2016): Standards #8, #16, #18, #19, #20, #47, #48 · PDF abcdefg
- Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.310 courtrules.net · (b)(4) and (c)(1); mirror ('Last updated: October 2026'; also read on floridacourtrules.com) shows a '2024 Amendment' committee note, but the January 1, 2025 effective date is not stated on the mirror; confirm the effective date against the Florida Bar's official rules PDF abcdefgh
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 30 (Legal Information Institute) law.cornell.edu · Rule 30(a)(2)(B), 30(b)(3), 30(b)(4), and 30(b)(5) abcdefghijk
- Fresno County Superior Court, PGN-61, Court Reporter Realtime Hardware/Software Requirements and Configuration fresno.courts.ca.gov · revision R04-21, marked mandatory; PDF modified February 27, 2026 · PDF ab
- Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Qualifications for Licensure: Certified Shorthand Reporter (084) idfpr.illinois.gov · effective 12/2024, revised January 30, 2026 · PDF abc
- Arizona Code of Judicial Administration § 1-602, Digital Recording of Court Proceedings azcourts.gov · AO 2023-116 effective July 3, 2023; as amended by AO 2024-58, effective April 10, 2024 · PDF abcde
- 45 CFR § 164.512 (Legal Information Institute) law.cornell.edu · subsection (e), judicial and administrative proceedings ab
- Court Reporters Board of California, Best Practice Pointer No. 14, Interpreted Depositions courtreportersboard.ca.gov · revised 3/2025 · PDF abcd
- National Center for State Courts (Suskin, McMillan, Hall), Making the Record Utilizing Digital Electronic Recording aaert.org · September 2013; copy hosted by AAERT; appendices on microphones, log notes, and appearance sheets · PDF abcdefghi
- NCRA Broadcast and CART Captioning Committee, The CART Captioner's Manual ncra.org · November 2019; some equipment items dated · PDF abcdefg
- NVRA, RCP-M Certification Test Rules, Policies, and Procedures nvra.org · revised February 22, 2023 · PDF abc
- 28 CFR § 35.104, Definitions (Legal Information Institute) law.cornell.edu · auxiliary aids and services abc
- NCRA, Certified Realtime Reporter ncra.org abc
- Court Reporters Board of California, Best Practice Pointer No. 4, Rough Draft Transcripts courtreportersboard.ca.gov · revised 3/2025 · PDF ab
- NVRA, RVR, RVR-S, RVR-M and RVR-M-S Certification Rules, Policies, and Procedures nvra.org · revised February 22, 2023 · PDF abc
- Stenograph, Luminex II User Guide stenograph.com · release November 2023; has the virtual-serial-port and client-isolation notes, but not the bench-conference USB quote (that is in the NexGen guide) · PDF abcdefghij
- Zoom Corporation, H6essential handheld recorder zoomcorp.com · manufacturer specifications, accessed October 13, 2026 abcd
- TASCAM, Portacapture X8 specifications tascam.com · manufacturer specifications, accessed October 13, 2026 abc
- Official Code of Georgia Annotated § 9-11-30 (FindLaw) codes.findlaw.com · subsection (b)(4); current as of March 28, 2024 abc
- Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 30 mass.gov · 30(b)(3)(B) and 30(b)(4), as amended December 27, 2024 (effective February 1, 2025) and March 5, 2025 (effective March 10, 2025; page 'Effective Date: 03/10/2025'); official mass.gov text read via Internet Archive capture of June 16, 2026 (https://web.archive.org/web/20260616184657/https://www.mass.gov/rules-of-civil-procedure/civil-procedure-rule-30-depositions-upon-oral-examination) and on courtrules.net (mass.gov returned 403) abcdefg
- Court Reporters Board of California, Best Practice Pointer No. 12, Use of Backup Audio Media courtreportersboard.ca.gov · revised 3/2025; guidance, not regulations · PDF abcde
- NCRA, COPE Guidelines for Professional Practice ncra.org · undated page, accessed October 13, 2026: Sections I.4, II, III (uncertified drafts), IV (backup audio media), V (remote proceedings) abcdefghijkl
- California Business and Professions Code section 8017.5 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · subdivision (b); text read on california.public.law (official site blocked automated access) ↩︎
- Court Reporters Board of California, Initial Statement of Reasons, Voice Writers (16 CCR 2403, 2411, 2414) courtreportersboard.ca.gov · August 3, 2023 · PDF ↩︎
- ProCAT, ProCAT Winner Suite, Voice Edition procat.com · page timestamp May 7, 2024 ab
- Minnesota Judicial Council Policy 523.1, Capturing the Record of Court Proceedings: Backup Recordings and District Copies mncourts.gov · revised January 18, 2024, effective July 1, 2024; read via Internet Archive capture of May 13, 2025 (official host returned 403). The May 1, 2025 revision was not read · PDF abcd
- Supreme Court of Georgia, Order approving Uniform Superior Court Rule 36.19, Digital Recording of Court Proceedings ocp.georgiacourts.gov · approved January 29, 2026, effective February 26, 2026 · PDF abcd
- AAERT, Table of Specifications (Blueprint) for the Certified Deposition Reporter (CDR) Examination aaert.org · July 2026 · PDF abcde
- NCRA/COPE Guidance, Use of Artificial Intelligence by Stenographic Court Reporters and Captioners ncra.org · July 17, 2026 per NCRA/JCR (JCR listing 'July 17, 2026 - NCRA COPE AI Guidance'); the PDF itself is undated (metadata created July 6, modified July 15, 2026) · PDF ab
- AAERT, Preserving the Gold Standard in Court Reporting: Professional Oversight in a Modern Legal System aaert.org · February 12, 2026 (per AAERT's WordPress API) ab
- Texas Office of Court Administration and Texas A&M PPRI, Digital Court Recording Study: Executive Summary, Findings, and Recommendations txcourts.gov · October 1, 2026 (date from the file name; the extract prints none); courtroom recording only · PDF abcd
- In re Hughey, No. 25-0463 (Supreme Court of Texas), docket and staff case summary search.txcourts.gov · argued October 6, 2026; 'Submitted (Awaiting Opinion)' with no opinion as of October 13, 2026; staff case summary PDF (docketed September 18, 2026) does not reflect the Court's views abc
- Stenograph, Wave User Guide stenograph.com · release April 2017 (file dated April 10, 2017); describes storage only as internal Memory, with no SD card mentioned · PDF ab
- Stenovations, LightSpeed Writer (Zenith) information stenovations.com · modified February 10, 2023 abcd
- ProCAT, Xpression writer procat.com · vendor page, accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- Stenograph Solution Center, Setting Audio Options on the NexGen, Luminex II, Luminex, and Diamante solutioncenter.stenograph.com · updated April 3, 2024 ab
- Advantage Software, Hardware Recommendations eclipsecat.com · accessed October 13, 2026; same page also served at eclipsecat.com/node/53 abc
- Journal of Court Reporting (NCRA), Ask the techie: Computer recommendations for CAT software thejcr.com · NCRA Technology Committee, April 5, 2022 ↩︎
- Martel Electronics, Ultimate Double Dragon 2 Stenomask martelelectronics.com · vendor page, accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- Talk Technologies, Steno SR Quick Start Guide cdn.shopify.com · © 2020 · PDF ab
- Talk Technologies, Sylencer/SmartMic Instruction Manual (TSM-R2) cdn.shopify.com · undated · PDF ab
- Talk Technologies, Stenomask Support and Troubleshooting FAQs talktech.com · accessed October 13, 2026; has a Windows 10/11 loopback mic test but no Windows 11 compatibility statement abc
- Nuance, Dragon Professional 16 Release Notes nuance.com · system requirements ↩︎
- Nuance, Dragon 16 Help, Troubleshooting your microphone nuance.com ↩︎
- Nuance, Dragon Professional (Windows) dragon.nuance.com · accessed October 13, 2026; no end-of-sale notice shown abc
- Nuance, Dragon Professional v14 and v15 Product Advisory Notice (Answer ID 29838) web.archive.org · published February 23, 2023, updated February 28, 2023; end of sale covers the English and German versions of six v15 editions; live URL https://nuance.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/29838/ returns HTTP 401, so read via Internet Archive capture of June 18, 2025; the only official Dragon lifecycle notice found ab
- Advantage Software, EclipseVox eclipsecat.com · accessed October 13, 2026; lists Dragon Professional v15 or later as required, v16 recommended for Windows 11 ab
- NVRA, CVR, CVR-S, CM, CM-S Certification Rules, Policies, and Procedures nvra.org · cover says revised August 2026; page footers say revised July 20, 2026; test rules, not job rules · PDF ab
- Advantage Software, Boost and Boost Flow terms eclipsecat.com · accessed October 13, 2026; no published terms on handling of speech audio sent for cloud processing ab
- SoniClear, Court Recorder 10 soniclear.com · vendor page, accessed October 13, 2026 ↩︎
- For The Record, FTR Gold fortherecord.com · vendor page, accessed October 13, 2026; the 16-channel line describes its FTR Reporter application; system requirements moved to a support portal we could not reach ↩︎
- AAERT, Best Practices Guide aaert.org · v2019 listed as current on October 13, 2026; a 2026 edition announced, not yet released abc
- Advantage Software, Bridge Mobile eclipsecat.com · accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- Advantage Software, Bridge Mobile with Connection Magic User Guide eclipsecat.com · © 2015 · PDF ↩︎
- Journal of Court Reporting (NCRA), CHECKLIST: What to bring on a reporting assignment thejcr.com · Robin Nodland, RDR, CRR, November 10, 2017; practitioner checklist abcd
- AKG/Crown (HARMAN), PZM185 boundary microphone manual support.harmanaudio.com · undated · PDF ↩︎
- Shure, MX412, MX418, MX424 Gooseneck Microphones user guide goknight.com · dated March 2, 2021; read on a dealer-hosted copy because Shure's own guide URL returned 404 · PDF ↩︎
- RØDE, How To Use a Lavalier Mic rode.com · undated ab
- NCRA Advisory Opinion 6, Going On and Off the Record ncra.org · 1987; combined with No. 42, 2014 ab
- Illinois Supreme Court Rule 206 illinoiscourts.gov · amended September 29, 2021, effective October 1, 2021: (a)(2), (f), (h), and Committee Comment abcdefg
- Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (Texas Judicial Branch compilation) txcourts.gov · compilation dated October 1, 2026: Rules 199.1(c) and 203.6(a) · PDF ab
- Journal of Court Reporting (NCRA), Mastering the steno bag: Essential tips for court reporters thejcr.com · Jill Parker Landsman, February 3, 2025; practitioner tips from Ninette Butler, Cindi Lynch (Stenograph training program manager), and Angie Podge abcde
- Court Reporters Board of California, Best Practice Pointer No. 11, Videoconference/Remote Reporting courtreportersboard.ca.gov · revised 3/2025 · PDF abcdefg
- In re Depo-Provera Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3140 (N.D. Fla.), Pretrial Order No. 16, Deposition Protocol flnd.uscourts.gov · filed March 14, 2025; binds that litigation only · PDF ab
- U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. (Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker), Sample Protocol for Remote Depositions transcripts.nysd.uscourts.gov · March 2021; a sample protocol, not a rule · PDF ab
- California Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.310 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · subdivisions (a) and (e); amended Stats. 2022, ch. 92 (SB 1037); official leginfo text read via Internet Archive capture of March 3, 2025 (https://web.archive.org/web/20250303224808/https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CCP§ionNum=2025.310); leginfo and FindLaw returned 403 ab
- Texas Government Code section 154.105 statutes.capitol.texas.gov · subsections (b) and (c); amended 2019 (SB 891), 2021 (HB 3774), and 2023 (HB 3474); text read on texas.public.law (official site is a JavaScript app) ↩︎
- New York Civil Practice Law and Rules 3113 newyork.public.law · subdivisions (b) and (d); last amended 2014; mirror read because the nysenate.gov law page was not found at the attempted URL abcde
- New York Senate Bill S10374 (2025-2026 session), remote depositions nysenate.gov · introduced and referred to Senate Judiciary May 15, 2026; 'In Senate Committee' as of October 13, 2026; read via WebFetch (curl returned 403) ab
- Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.530 courtrules.net · subdivision (b)(2)(B), applied to depositions by Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.310(c)(1); mirror (page 'Last updated: October 2026'); confirm against the Florida Bar's official rules PDF ↩︎
- Zoom Support, Changing security settings in a Zoom meeting (KB0061231) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 13, 2026; crawler-served page ab
- NCRA COPE, AI Notetakers and Summation Bots: Guidance for Stenographic Court Reporters and Captioners ncra.org · July 2026; the PDF is undated (metadata created July 6, modified July 15, 2026); a July 17, 2026 date could not be confirmed for this notice · PDF abc
- Journal of Court Reporting (NCRA), COPE: Remote depositions thejcr.com · Dannielle Copeland and Liz Harvey (COPE members), September 29, 2020; not a formal opinion ↩︎
- NCRA Advisory Opinion 44, Reporter acting as videographer ncra.org · originally written 2006 ab
- Zoom Support, Starting a computer recording (KB0076922) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 11, 2026; crawler-served page ab
- Zoom Support, Changing basic and advanced cloud recording settings (KB0064676) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 13, 2026; crawler-served page ↩︎
- Zoom Support, Understanding recording file formats (KB0064394) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 8, 2026; disagrees with KB0064676 on cloud per-participant audio ab
- Zoom Support, Managing meeting breakout rooms (KB0062540) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 13, 2026; crawler-served page ↩︎
- Microsoft Support, Record a meeting in Microsoft Teams support.microsoft.com · ms.date September 10, 2026; OneDrive storage described is for non-channel meetings ↩︎
- Zoom Support, Setting up professional audio for Zoom Meetings (KB0059985) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 8, 2026; read from the server-rendered page Zoom serves to crawlers ab
- Advantage Software, The Sound of Precision (Eclipse 12 audio webinar) eclipsecat.com · recorded March 27-28, 2025; a course description, not a manual ↩︎
- Microsoft Learn, Loopback Recording (Windows Core Audio) learn.microsoft.com · ms.date April 16, 2025 ↩︎
- Veritext, Tips and Tricks to Providing the Best Remote Service veritext.com · Camille Schmitt and Rosalie Kramm, undated (footer © 2025); agency guidance; read via WebFetch (curl returned 403) abc
- Zoom Support, Using a third-party closed captioning service (KB0060368) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 6, 2026; crawler-served page ↩︎
- The Florida Bar, Recommended Best Practices Guide for Remote Court Proceedings flcourts18.org · updated 07-2022; copy hosted by Florida's Eighteenth Circuit · PDF abc
- Microsoft Learn, Prepare your organization's network for Microsoft Teams learn.microsoft.com · ms.date May 26, 2026 ↩︎
- Zoom Support, Zoom system requirements: Windows, macOS, Linux (KB0060748) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 6, 2026; crawler-served page; bandwidth figures are recommendations, not minimums ↩︎
- Steno, Technology and Workspace Recommendations help.steno.com · undated (© 2026 Steno Agency, Inc.); page addressed to court reporters; agency guidance ↩︎
- Louisiana Judicial College, Best Practices for Remote Technology in Legal Proceedings lajudicialcollege.org · Judge Suzanne de Mahy and Christopher Washington, about 2025; judicial-education paper, not a court rule · PDF abc
- Michigan State Court Administrative Office, Manual for Court Reporters and Recorders courts.michigan.gov · Section 2 (Official Court Reporter/Recorder), Ch. 8 Analog Audio Recording Procedures (rev. 6/19), and Section 2 Appendix, Operating Procedures for Digital Recording (rev. 6/19-12/21; PDF modified December 4, 2021): headphone monitoring, interpreter channels, videoconference audio. Section 1 (rev. 7/16) is not cited · PDF abcd
- Advantage Software, Audio (Eclipse) eclipsecat.com · undated; an older audio FAQ (MediaLink) about syncing a separate audio recorder, not video ab
- NCRA Advisory Opinion 47, Inclusion into the transcript of comments picked up by videotape but not heard by reporter ncra.org · 2015 ↩︎
- Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Federal Court Reporting Program uscourts.gov · last updated October 1, 2024; methods of recording and the realtime definition abc
- U.S. District Court, W.D. Texas, Official Court Reporter (San Antonio), Announcement USDC 25/23 web.archive.org · opened March 3, 2026; read via Internet Archive capture of June 13, 2026 because the live URL (https://www.uscourts.gov/careers/current-job-openings/136943) no longer shows the posting; one district's posting (Guide Vol. 12 § 580.40.30 is not public) abcd
- California Government Code section 69955 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · official reporters' notes; text read on california.public.law ↩︎
- California Rules of Court, rule 2.954 courts.ca.gov · amended effective January 1, 2016; wording predates current digital systems ab
- California Government Code section 69957 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · subdivision (a); text read on california.public.law (official site blocked) ab
- Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court (Cal. Supreme Court, S288176) courts.ca.gov · filed August 10, 2026: disposition and footnote 5 · PDF abcd
- Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa, Combined Standing Orders contracosta.courts.ca.gov · August 11, 2026 · PDF ↩︎
- Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Order Rescinding the General Order re Operation of Electronic Recording Equipment santaclara.courts.ca.gov · filed August 14, 2026 · PDF ↩︎
- Michigan State Court Administrative Office, Michigan Trial Court Standards for Courtroom Technology courts.michigan.gov · revised 9/22 · PDF abc
- Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.535 courtrules.net · subdivisions (a)(4), (h)(4), and (i); mirror (page dated October 2026) abc
- Stenograph Solution Center, RealTeam FAQ solutioncenter.stenograph.com · updated July 17, 2022 ab
- California Business and Professions Code section 8017 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · text read on california.public.law ab
- California Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.510 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · subdivision (a); text read on california.public.law ↩︎
- California Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.530 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · subdivision (a); text read on california.public.law ↩︎
- HHS Office for Civil Rights, HIPAA FAQ 709: Must a lawyer require those persons to whom it discloses information to abide by privacy restrictions? hhs.gov · content last reviewed January 9, 2023; read via Internet Archive capture of August 18, 2026 (live page returned 403) ab
- Court Reporters Board of California, Best Practice Pointer No. 16, Secure Transmission, Confidentiality, and Cybersecurity courtreportersboard.ca.gov · revised 9/2025; guidance, not a basis for discipline · PDF ab
- Stenograph Solution Center, Creating a Cloud Backup Account solutioncenter.helpjuice.com · accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- 28 U.S.C. § 1827, Interpreters in courts of the United States (Legal Information Institute) law.cornell.edu · subsections (d)(2) and (k) ↩︎
- Washington Court Rules, GR 11.3, Remote Interpretation courts.wa.gov · amended through November 1, 2022: (d), (h), and comment 5 · PDF ↩︎
- Iowa Court Rule 47.11, Recording of court proceedings legis.iowa.gov · chapter dated July 2025 · PDF ↩︎
- Zoom Support, Using Language Interpretation in your meeting or webinar (KB0064768) support.zoom.com · dateModified October 7, 2026; crawler-served page ↩︎
- Microsoft Support, Use language interpretation in Microsoft Teams meetings support.microsoft.com · ms.date September 10, 2026 ↩︎
- Webex Help Center, Simultaneous interpretation in Webex meetings, webinars and Personal Rooms help.webex.com · page dated September 28, 2026 ↩︎
- Judicial Council of California, Recommended Guidelines and Minimum Specifications for Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) for Spoken Language-Interpreted Events languageaccess.courts.ca.gov · adopted May 21, 2021; does not address court reporters · PDF ↩︎
- NCRA, Code of Professional Ethics for CART and Broadcast Captioners (with COPE General Guidelines) ncra.org · undated page, accessed October 13, 2026 abcd
- NCRA Broadcast and CART Captioning Committee, Guidelines for CART Captioners ncra.org · revised October 2016; platform list dated · PDF abc
- 28 CFR § 35.160, Communications (Legal Information Institute) law.cornell.edu ↩︎
- Guide to Judiciary Policy, Vol. 5: Court Interpreting (Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts) uscourts.gov · Ch. 2 last revised July 30, 2026: § 255 · PDF ab
- NCRA, Certified Realtime Captioner ncra.org · education component dropped from October 1, 2025 ab
- NVRA, What is CART/Captioning? nvra.org ↩︎
- NCRA STRONG, Choosing a Court Reporter by Transcription Method ncra.org · Lisa Migliore Black, undated; NCRA advocacy · PDF ab
- Stenograph, MAXScribe stenograph.com · vendor page, accessed October 13, 2026; claims not independently verified ↩︎
- For The Record, FTR RealTime Go Recorder fortherecord.com · vendor page, accessed October 13, 2026; claims not independently verified ↩︎
- Stenograph, CATalyst Voice stenograph.com · © 2026 ↩︎
- California Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.540 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · subdivision (b), as quoted in CRB Best Practice Pointer No. 4 (official site blocked) ↩︎
- Federal Aviation Administration, PackSafe: Lithium Batteries faa.gov · last updated August 11, 2026 ab
- Federal Aviation Administration, Airline Passengers and Batteries FAQ faa.gov · last updated October 2, 2026 ↩︎
- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Notice to Legal Visitors: Rules of Conduct Regarding the Use of Computer Laptops, Tablets and External Memory Devices bop.gov · PDF modified July 14, 2025 · PDF ab
- Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Laptop and/or Tablet Request and Acknowledgment Form (SH-J-460) pars.lasd.org · revised 11/2025 · PDF ↩︎
- California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, DOM 54020.32.9, Depositions cdcr.ca.gov · Article 42 revised May 1, 2003 ab
- Stenograph Solution Center, Windows Power Options solutioncenter.stenograph.com · updated April 29, 2026; Windows 11 instructions ab
- AAERT Government Relations Committee, Analysis and Advantages of Digital Court Reporting and Recording aaert.org · November 2016 · PDF ↩︎
- Amazon Web Services, Amazon Transcribe Developer Guide: Data input and output docs.aws.amazon.com · accessed October 13, 2026; one example of cloud speech-recognition terms ab
- Google Cloud, Speech-to-Text: Best practices to provide data docs.cloud.google.com · last updated October 9, 2026 abc
- Zoom Corporation, H6 Handy Recorder Operation Manual zoomcorp.com · © 2020 · PDF ab
- TASCAM, DR-40X Reference Manual tascam.eu · document D01354020D (Rev. D) · PDF ab
- Zoom Corporation, H6essential Operation Manual zoomcorp.com · © 2024 · PDF ↩︎
- Florida Courts Technology Commission, Technical and Functional Standards for Integrated Digital Court Recording Systems flcourts-media.flcourts.gov · March 2021 · PDF ab
- Stenograph Solution Center, Audio Codecs solutioncenter.helpjuice.com · updated August 10, 2023; codec table covers Case CATalyst Version 16 and higher ↩︎
- AAERT, Making the Right Choice: Certified Digital Court Reporting vs. Unmonitored Recording Systems aaert.org · October 29, 2025 (per AAERT's WordPress API) ab
- Stenograph, Diamante User Guide stenograph.com · PDF dated July 30, 2014 · PDF ↩︎
- Stenograph, Case CATalyst Installation and Configuration Guide, Version 18 stenograph.com · © 2017; Auto Recover and Auto Save · PDF ab
- Advantage Software, Files (Total Eclipse) eclipsecat.com · accessed October 13, 2026 ↩︎
- ProCAT, How Do I Setup My Autosave? procat.com · last modified July 24, 2024 ↩︎
- Gigatron Software, StenoCAT Reporter gsclion.com · © 2026 ↩︎
- Stenograph Solution Center, Backup (Case CATalyst) solutioncenter.stenograph.com · accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- Stenograph, CATalyst Cloud Backup FAQs stenograph.com · accessed October 13, 2026 ↩︎
- California Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.510 leginfo.legislature.ca.gov · subdivision (e), confirmed on the mirror (updated January 1, 2015); text read on california.public.law (official site blocked) ↩︎
- AAERT, Code of Professional Ethics aaert.org · accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- NVRA, Code of Ethics nvra.org · 2004, revised 02/2010: Canons II and VI ab
- NCRA, Code of Professional Ethics ncra.org · Provision 4 ↩︎
- 16 CCR § 2475, Professional Standards of Practice (Legal Information Institute) law.cornell.edu · operative January 1, 2014: subdivision (b)(2) ↩︎
- Microsoft Learn, BitLocker overview learn.microsoft.com · ms.date August 24, 2026 ↩︎
- AAERT, Table of Specifications (Blueprint) for the Certified Electronic Reporter (CER) Examination aaert.org · July 2026 · PDF ↩︎
- Office of Administrative Law, Notice of Approval, Court Reporters Board voice-writer regulations (16 CCR 2403, 2411, 2414) courtreportersboard.ca.gov · approved December 18, 2023; effective April 1, 2024 · PDF ↩︎
- CalMatters Digital Democracy, AB 1189 (2025-2026) calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org · secondary bill tracker; status Failed, last action February 2, 2026 (official leginfo page returned 403) ↩︎
- Court Reporters Board of California, Eligibility for Examination courtreportersboard.ca.gov · accessed October 13, 2026; AB 3252, effective January 1, 2025 ab
- Texas Government Code section 154.101 statutes.capitol.texas.gov · subsections (c), (e), and (f); last amended 2023; text read on texas.public.law ab
- Texas Judicial Branch Certification Commission, Oral Exam txcourts.gov · undated, accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- Florida House of Representatives, Staff Analysis, CS/HB 571 (Court Reporter Registry) flsenate.gov · 2019 · PDF ↩︎
- NCRA, State Certification Requirements (SONAR) ncra.org · PDF metadata January 17, 2024; state associations' self-reports ↩︎
- Board of Court Reporting of the Judicial Council of Georgia, Rules and Regulations ocp.georgiacourts.gov · revised September 7, 2018: Article 4 · PDF abcd
- Georgia Office of Court Professionals, Board of Court Reporting ocp.georgiacourts.gov · accessed October 13, 2026 ab
- Tennessee Code Annotated § 20-9-603 (FindLaw) codes.findlaw.com · current as of January 2, 2024 ↩︎
- Tennessee Code Annotated § 20-9-602 (FindLaw) codes.findlaw.com · current as of January 2, 2024; the full definition sentence was confirmed only in a search excerpt of Justia's copy ab
- Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance, Court Reporting Program: How to Get a License tn.gov · accessed October 13, 2026 abc
- Arizona Code of Judicial Administration § 7-206, Certified Reporter courtrules.net · last amended by AO 2026-84, effective July 1, 2026; mirror (page dated September 2026), quoting A.R.S. § 32-4001 ab
- Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 656, Court Reporters and Court Reporting Firms leg.state.nv.us · NRS 656.030 ↩︎
- Washington Court Rules, GR 35, Official Certified Superior Court Transcripts courts.wa.gov · effective September 1, 2015; amended September 1, 2018 · PDF ab
- Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 18.145, Court Reporters app.leg.wa.gov · RCW 18.145.020 and 18.145.040 ↩︎
- Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 8 oregonlegislature.gov · ORS 8.415 and 8.420 ↩︎
- Louisiana House Judiciary Committee, vote on HB 188 (2026 Regular Session) legis.la.gov · March 26, 2026; bill text at https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1439652 ab
- NVRA, Where Voice Writers Practice nvra.org · accessed October 13, 2026; the linked state-requirements PDF returned 404 ↩︎
- NCRA, Registered Merit Reporter ncra.org ↩︎
- AAERT, Important Updates: AAERT Exam Improvements Launching March 26, 2026 aaert.org · March 2026 ↩︎
- AAERT, CAPTUR: Merger Details aaert.org · AAERT and STAR members ratified the merger in May 2026 ab
- NCRA, Certified Legal Video Specialist ncra.org · certification requirements (the existing id ncra-clvs points to NCRA's 'What is certified legal videography' page) ↩︎
- Court Reporters Board of California, Skills Exam FAQ courtreportersboard.ca.gov · PDF ↩︎
- Texas Judicial Branch Certification Commission, Certification by Endorsement txcourts.gov · undated, accessed October 13, 2026 ↩︎
- NCRA, Opposition of the Proposed Sunset of the Tennessee Board of Court Reporting (letter of NCRA President Kristin M. Anderson) thejcr.com · November 30, 2023 · PDF ↩︎
- NCRA, Emerging Ethical and Legal Issues Related to the Use of AI, ASR, Voice Cloning, and Digital Audio Recording of Legal Proceedings ncra.org · November 2023 (STRONG Committee) ↩︎
- NVRA, What is a Voice Writer? nvra.org ↩︎
- AAERT, 2025 Court Reporting Industry Trends Report (press release) aaert.org · April 10, 2025 (dateline and WordPress API); AAERT's own figures, methodology not reviewed; report PDF linked from the page, not opened ↩︎
- Speech to Text Institute, Best Practices and FAQ (archived) web.archive.org · Internet Archive captures of 2019-2021 pages; the live site served a default server page on October 13, 2026 ↩︎
- In re Hughey, No. 09-25-00194-CV (Tex. App., Beaumont May 29, 2025), memorandum opinion search.txcourts.gov · per curiam memorandum opinion (735 S.W.3d 810), PDF linked from the docket; mandamus denied ↩︎
- Texas H.B. 3474, 88th Legislature (2023), enrolled, Article 10 capitol.texas.gov · §§ 10.008 and 10.010(a) (uncodified) ↩︎
Court rules, statutes, licensing rules, and vendor documentation change, and the rules tables are stated as of October 13, 2026. The rules that govern your proceeding, and your certifying body's guidance, control. Product names are examples of what each maker's own documentation says, not recommendations or rankings. Tables and checklists marked as ours are DepoStack's synthesis of the sources cited, not an industry standard.
